How does one platform lower total cost vs separate PMS, POS and accounting?

One WinX platform replaces a stack of separately licensed products and the paid interfaces between them. That typically means one perpetual license and one support-and-maintenance stream instead of four to six vendor renewals, fewer servers, MySQL rather than per-seat Microsoft SQL Server licensing, and less middleware. Savings depend on property mix and scope and are confirmed in a written proposal.

Does WinX have a public price list?

No. WinX is not sold via a published subscription price. EHORS issues a confidential written proposal after a discovery call, scoped to your properties, modules, deployment model and implementation. Investment typically includes a perpetual license, milestone-based implementation, and annual or quarterly support and maintenance.

Where do the operational savings come from, beyond licensing?

From automation and integration: outlet charges post straight to the folio and the GL, night audit runs automatically, workflows are paperless, and staff stop reconciling data across separate systems by hand. Customers have reported a 15 to 20 percent net profit improvement after implementation, though outcomes vary by property mix.

Insights

The real cost of running PMS, POS and accounting as separate systems

The licence quote for each system is the part you see. The expensive part is everything around it — the renewals, the interfaces that connect them, and the staff hours spent reconciling data the systems can't share. Here's where a multi-vendor stack quietly costs more, and how one platform changes the maths.

The pain: you're paying for the gaps between systems

A typical property licenses a PMS, a POS, an accounting package, and often separate ticketing and spa systems — then pays again for the integrations that make them talk. Each of those carries its own line items year after year:

Stacked licences and renewals — four to six vendors, each with its own annual support-and-maintenance contract.
Paid interfaces and middleware — connectors between PMS, POS and finance that cost money and break when any vendor updates.
Database and infrastructure — per-seat database licensing and multiple siloed servers to keep each system running.
Manual reconciliation — finance and operations stitch data together by hand because the systems don't share one source of truth.

Why it happens: best-of-breed adds up

Buying the "best" point solution for each function feels prudent, but each one arrives as its own product with its own licence, its own renewal, and its own integration cost. The total cost of ownership isn't the sum of the quotes — it's the sum of the quotes plus the connective tissue and the manual work needed to run them as if they were one system.

How WinX changes the maths: one platform

WinX replaces the stack with one integrated hospitality platform — PMS, multi-outlet POS, accounting, ticketing, spa, F&B, HR and reporting in a single product. The cost structure shifts:

One perpetual licence + one S&M stream instead of four to six vendor renewals.
Fewer paid interfaces — modules already share one database, so there's little middleware to license or maintain.
MySQL, not per-seat Microsoft SQL Server licensing common on legacy stacks; fewer application servers, one cluster instead of many siloed hosts.
Less manual work — outlet charges post straight to the folio and the GL, night audit runs automatically, workflows are paperless.

The shift: from paying for systems and the glue between them, to paying for one platform where the integration is the product. Exact savings depend on your property mix and are confirmed in a written proposal — there is no published price list.

What operators report

Beyond licensing, the savings come from automation: customers have reported a 15–20% net profit improvement after implementation (outcomes vary by property mix). EHORS does not publish a fixed savings percentage — every property receives an individual confidential proposal after a discovery call, covering perpetual licence, implementation and support & maintenance.

Common questions

How does one platform lower total cost vs separate systems?: One WinX licence and one S&M stream replace four to six vendor renewals plus the paid interfaces between them, with MySQL rather than per-seat SQL Server and fewer servers. Savings depend on scope and are confirmed in a proposal.
Does WinX have a public price list?: No — WinX is not sold via a published subscription price. EHORS issues a confidential written proposal after a discovery call: perpetual licence, milestone-based implementation, and support & maintenance.
Where do the operational savings come from?: Automation and integration — charges post to the folio and GL, automatic night audit, paperless workflows, and no manual reconciliation across separate systems.

Get a total-cost view for your property mix.

Request a WinX proposal